01
Search foundations
Public titles, descriptions, headings, canonical and indexability signals, sitemap/robots availability and representative internal links.
Search Console history and ranking causes need authorised account data.
Clarity before a rebuild
Tell us what is not working. We review your public homepage and representative pages, then explain the priority issues, why they matter and what to do next. No password required. No obligation to buy.
An initial review—not an unlimited audit
01
Public titles, descriptions, headings, canonical and indexability signals, sitemap/robots availability and representative internal links.
Search Console history and ranking causes need authorised account data.
02
Representative page loading, image weight, layout shifts, readable content and navigation or enquiry journeys on mobile.
Lab tests are snapshots. Field data is used when available; it is not available for every site.
03
HTTPS behaviour and publicly returned security headers, with issues described in context.
No password testing, exploitation, private-data access or vulnerability-scanning promise.
04
Visible calls to action, form labels, error guidance, contact links and consent choices.
Inbox delivery requires a separately agreed test, not just a successful-looking form.
Not included: an exhaustive site crawl, private account access, penetration testing, malware removal, remediation, formal WCAG certification or a promise of higher rankings. Do not submit passwords or personal customer data. These require separate written scope and authorisation.
Illustrative preview · fictional examples, not findings about your site
Your report will reflect the pages actually reviewed. These examples show the format, not a promised number of findings or a prediction of results.
High · enquiry journey
Why it matters: A visitor cannot reach the intended form.
Next step: Correct the destination and retest the complete journey on mobile.
Medium · loading
Why it matters: The first useful screen may take longer to appear.
Next step: Resize and optimise the image, then compare repeatable measurements.
Investigate · search
Why it matters: The intended indexing signal may be inconsistent.
Next step: Check whether this is intentional; use authorised Search Console data before deciding.
Select your priorities and provide an email for the findings. Tell us whether you manage the website or are authorised to request the review.
We check representative public pages and flag the scope or access questions that need your input. Findings distinguish evidence from assumptions.
Use the findings with your own developer, ask for clarification or request our scoped quotation. Fixes are never billed without agreement.
One free review per domain every 90 days. We use your details to respond to this request—not to enrol you in a newsletter. Read the form notice before submitting.
Three short steps: website and contact details → optional priorities → notes and permission. Phone, company and notes are optional. After submission, a confirmation page acknowledges receipt; the findings follow by email after review. If you cannot complete the form, contact us without sharing passwords or customer records.
A separately scoped accessibility review of agreed pages and key journeys. Confirm coverage, manual testing, documentation and exclusions before payment. This is technical guidance, not legal advice or a guarantee of compliance.
Flat fee · one public domain
₹9,999
Indian billing
$99
International billing
Detailed PDF report with WCAG 2.2 AA findings, severity ratings, code-level remediation guidance and a VPAT template.
Paid audit checkout
Use this checkout only for the one-domain paid accessibility audit described here. Contact us before payment if the website requires a login, covers multiple domains or needs an urgent schedule. Razorpay is not contacted before you choose to load it. When loaded, Razorpay may receive connection, browser and device information and will process payment details under its own terms.
We review the public homepage and representative pages for search visibility foundations, mobile usability, loading behaviour, obvious broken journeys and publicly visible HTTPS/security-header signals. Findings are prioritised with suggested next steps. It is an initial review, not an exhaustive crawl, penetration test or formal accessibility certification.
We aim to send the initial findings within two business days after reviewing your request and confirming access and scope. If the website is complex or cannot be reached, we will discuss a different schedule. This is a target, not a guaranteed turnaround.
No. The free review uses public pages. Do not send passwords, customer records or confidential documents through the form. Any later access to Analytics, Search Console or the CMS is separately authorised and limited to the agreed work.
The initial public-page review is free and does not oblige you to buy development or maintenance. One free review per domain every 90 days applies. Remediation, a larger crawl, formal accessibility testing or security testing requires a separate agreed scope and quotation.
We review your website URL and selected concerns, confirm any scope questions, then send prioritised findings to the email you provide. You may implement them yourself, use your existing developer or request a separate quotation from us.
No. Rankings depend on many factors beyond a technical review. Public-page checks cannot establish that a website is secure, detect every vulnerability or prove legal compliance. Intrusive testing requires explicit written authorisation and a separate scope.
The free review may highlight obvious usability or accessibility issues. A formal WCAG review with representative journeys, keyboard and assistive-technology testing and remediation evidence is a separately scoped paid service.